Berger 6.5mm 153.5gr Hybrid Bullet

Stumpm2

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2022
Messages
22
Reaction score
13
Points
3
Location
Wyoming
Does anybody have any experience/results from the Berger 6.5mm 153.5gr Hybrid bullet? Looking for comparisons to the 156grain EOL. Thanks.

 

Straightshooter1

Active member
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Messages
174
Reaction score
164
Points
43
Location
Arizona
Does anybody have any experience/results from the Berger 6.5mm 153.5gr Hybrid bullet? Looking for comparisons to the 156grain EOL. Thanks.
As far as accuracy results, they work very well for me:

1667357383865.png 6.5 Berger 153.5 2022-1-30.jpg

Is this the kink of experience/results you were thinking of?
 

Stumpm2

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2022
Messages
22
Reaction score
13
Points
3
Location
Wyoming
Thanks. They look to be pretty forgiving from your data. Any terminal performance?
 

Straightshooter1

Active member
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Messages
174
Reaction score
164
Points
43
Location
Arizona
Thanks. They look to be pretty forgiving from your data. Any terminal performance?

Out of my 26" bull barrel, they've performed quite well at around 2920 fps with my RL23 load as well as with 56.3 gr of Retumbo at the same velocity. My ballistics app shows down range velocity at 1200 yds. at 1586 fps; at 1000 yds., need ~247" elevation.
 

Stumpm2

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2022
Messages
22
Reaction score
13
Points
3
Location
Wyoming
How do they compare in OAL compared to the 156 grain with the same jump?
 

Straightshooter1

Active member
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Messages
174
Reaction score
164
Points
43
Location
Arizona
How do they compare in OAL compared to the 156 grain with the same jump?
Since there really no relationship for OAL to jump, I assume you're actually interested in the difference in their BTO???

Berger's published BTO:
153.5 = .826"
156 = .809"

Berger's published Bearing Surface:
153.5 = .560"
156 = .545"

Berger's published OAL:
153.5 = 1.514"
156 = 1.512"

Doing some math taking into account the other variations . . . my loads have a seating depth of .478". If I seat 156's to the same exact seating depth, they'd be ~.019" farther from the lands than the 153.5's. And the MV's for the 156's at that seating depth is ~ 20-25 fps slower. That longer bearing surface of the 153.5 suggests to me that it tends to be more stable than the 156's.

Of course, one would have to take the variations into account that occurs from lot to lot for each.
 
Last edited:

Ironworker

Active member
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
158
Reaction score
58
Points
28
Location
Nevada
I have a Bergara Premier, I shot the 156 when my rifle had the factory bbl, and I seated to magazine depth. {I'm not as detail organized as Staightshooter} Behind 56grs of N565 3,000FPS and 3/4 MOA was easily achieved. Now with a 28" Bart HV contour, the 153.5 with the same magazine seating depth and load, 3125FPS, and 1/2 MOA is easily produced.
 

sveltri

New member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
23
Reaction score
4
Points
3
I'm shooting them in a Savage Desert Tactical 24" barrel, it shoots this load consistently right at .5, 58.1 N565, 2990 fps. Bullets are seated to just fit inside an AICS mag. Shot a cow elk at 360, she went 35-40 yards and died quickly. I found most of the bullet (pieces) just inside the hide on the offside.
 

no_click

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
11
Reaction score
23
Points
3
Location
IA
Ruger American 22”, running 2530. We’ve ran them up to 2620 out of that barrel, but it really likes the node at 2530
 

InGodsCountry

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2023
Messages
16
Reaction score
6
Points
3
May have to look into these as well. Currently using a 143 grain pill but wanting a little more weight for our big bodied mule deer this fall.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Forum Sponsors

Top